His Thoughts, My Tips on How to Be a Great Leader
For the past several months, the New York Times has been running interviews on leadership with the CEO's of well known organizations. They're almost always interesting. Sometimes I agree with the points they make, sometimes I learn something new and, honestly, sometimes I find myself wondering, "How did this person become a CEO?" The latest Times interview subject is Dave Novak, CEO of Yum Brands. I think it's the best one in the series so far.
To counteract the karma of my last post about how terrible leadership helped blow up AIG, I thought I'd share seven thoughts from Dave Novak on how to be a great leader along with a tip from me on how to follow through on that thought. The bold face points are direct quotes from Novak, my accompanying tip is in plain face type:
If you have someone who's smart, talented, aggressive and wants to learn, then your job is to help them become all they can be. When you think back on your own development as a leader, you probably grew the most through big stretch assignments that took you out of your comfort zone. Look for and create opportunities for your best people to be even better by asking them to lead new initiatives or fix important things that are broken.
The best leaders are really pattern thinkers. Build your capacity for seeing the bigger picture by doing three things. 1.Get into the habit of regularly asking yourself, "What are we really trying to do here?" 2. Question your assumptions. 3. Read outside your area of responsibility or expertise and look for insights that can be applied to your work.
If you're the leader, you've got to provide the coaching. Coaching is about asking questions, not giving the answers. Accelerate the development of your best people by asking questions like, "What did you learn from this?" Help them process the lessons they can learn from experience and determine how to apply those lessons going forward.
Make sure that you're focusing on action versus activity. Think about the outcomes you're trying to create over the course of the year and then reverse engineer back from that to determine the actions that are most likely to lead to the results you want. Share this approach with your team and coach them to continually assess whether their involved in actions or activities.
No one's going to care about you unless you care about them. It's all too easy for results oriented leaders to overlook the importance of connecting with people. Make it a habit to open a meeting or conversation with a couple of questions about the other person. Learn what's important to them and look for ways to act on that.
You care enough to give them direct feedback. As Novak suggests in his interview and Ken Blanchard recommends in the The One Minute Manager, start your feedback with what they're doing that you appreciate. Tell them what the positive impact is of their action. Then connect your developmental feedback to how it will help both them and the organization be even more effective.
When you're the leader, people want to see you. The larger the leadership role, the more demands there are on your time. I encourage leaders to think about their communications and visibility strategies as both retail and wholesale opportunities. Retail visibility is in person and usually one on one or in small groups. Wholesale visibility makes use of large group meetings and technology (e.g. web conferencing, video and teleconferencing, blogging, Twitter, etc.) to consistently get key messages out and maintain dialogue with a broader audience.
There was a lot more wisdom in Novak's comments than there is space in a short blog post to cover them. Take a look at it and let me know a couple of things. What are your taking away from the Novak interview? What thoughts or tips would you add to the list of what great leaders do and how to do it?
COMMENTS
Post a Comment
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Executive coach Scott Eblin’s goal is to help you succeed at the next level of leadership. Throughout the week, he’ll offer his take on the leadership lessons in the news and his advice on your most pressing leadership questions. A former government executive, Scott is a graduate of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and is the author of The Next Level: What Insiders Know About Executive Success.








3 things I drew from the article were the difference between the words "and" and "but". A customer service manager taught me how to do that 13+ years and I have been practicing it ever since. The other idea is how much a leader needs to visible. I fell into the trap in my career of trying "to lead by e-mail" because I was so busy. That doesn't work. Lastly, I like his concept of "so what vs. now what". Great thoughts and perspectives. Thanks for sharing.
J. Doe Posted Monday, July 20, 2009 8:40 AMGreat article, but what is a "pattern thinker?" This was not explained. Can you please elaborate? Thanks!
Charlie Posted Monday, July 20, 2009 12:35 PMScott:
Very informative post. I particularly like the concept of reverse engineering back from the outcomes you're trying to create over the course of the year to determine the actions that would most likely lead to the results you want. As the old saying goes: “If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there."
K. Scott Derrick Posted Monday, July 20, 2009 5:26 PMThanks for the comments everyone. Charlie, while I can't speak for Dave Novak, I would say that pattern thinkers see the entire forest and not just the individual trees. It's about seeing how the individual pieces or issues fit together to create the whole picture.
Scott Eblin Posted Monday, July 20, 2009 9:25 PMRegarding your 1st point - As a manager/leader, it is my job to help my subordinates 'become all they can be' whether they are or are not 'smart, talented, aggressive and want to learn'. It can be a whole lot simpler if there is an internal drive in that person, but that doesn't negate my role in the effort. And at times, my help can be to bring them to either the stage where they exhibit those qualities, or to a duty position where the lack of those qualities still maximizes their positive contribution to my organization.
Bob Roulston Posted Friday, July 24, 2009 2:46 PM