By Tom Shoop | Monday, February 14, 2005 | 08:53 PM
Whole buncha replies to my item below about the widespread availability of government salary information. For starters, plenty of folks reminded me that federal employees' salaries are a matter of public record, so finding out your coworkers' grade level and bonuses is as simple as filing a Freedom of Information Act request. (Or even simpler: Let's just say that more than one person noted that the Washington Post helpfully makes this information available in a database on its Web site.) And agencies often make a big public deal of the incentive awards granted to employees.
This situation obviously emboldens a lot of workers to quiz their fellow employees about their pay. "Believe me, federal employees know exactly what people in their section or branch or division are making," says one Defense employee. "Bad form to ask? Maybe, but a lot of people ask." Some employees try to brush off the snoops. A first-line supervisor with 36 years of government service says, "Each year, I advise my employees to resist the temptation to respond to co-workers questions about their awards. I have even suggested they have three choices: to say 'no comment,' to change the subject or to lie."
While of course it's true that the current system encourages employees to track how their compensation compares to those around them, there are indications that things operate differently under pay-banding systems. A Navy employee who has been in a pay-for-performance demonstration project for 20 years says, "You're absolutely correct about co-workers openly discussing individual salaries--it just isn't normally brought up. Whereas, we may know which pay band a coworker is in, we are typically not aware of where within the pay band they lie. Sometimes, the gap between a junior employee in the pay band and a 'topped out' individual is more than $30,000. And we certainly don't divulge our annual performance ratings." An FAA employee adds, "I can speak from my experience with pay banding, that no one really discloses their pay any more, since not all get the additional annual Superior Contribution Increase. When I worked at DoD, it was commonplace to discuss grade and step."
This will clearly be an area to watch as the transition to performance pay unfolds. Thanks for all the e-mails.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










