By Tom Shoop | Friday, February 24, 2006 | 09:58 AM
When all else fails, throw the bureaucracy under the bus. That, unfortunately, was one of the messages sent by White House homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend yesterday during a press briefing on the administration’s Katrina lessons learned report.
President Bush, Townsend said, “accepted responsibility for the shortcomings in the federal response.” But it was a curious sort of acceptance that mostly found fault with people far lower on the chain of command.
While other investigations have criticized administration officials for being disengaged from the response process, Townsend recommended putting even more distance between the president and federal officials on the scene of disasters. At the same time that she repeatedly bemoaned “red tape” in the Katrina response, Townsend argued that FEMA Director Michael Brown’s problem was that he was more interested in getting information directly to the White House than in following the chain of command set out in the Homeland Security organizational chart:
We know from Director Brown's testimony that [Homeland Security] Secretary [Michael] Chertoff reached out for him a number of times. It wasn't that there was bureaucracy between them, it was that he didn't -- he's testified that he didn't want to deal with the Secretary. The answer is, what we need is a system that gets the information and the needs of the people in the disaster area up to the decision-maker, who is Secretary Chertoff, who is responsible for the department. Those operations aren't run out of the White House; they never are.
Townsend acknowledged the need for “a better structure at the White House,” but only to “cut through the red tape and to referee any needless disputes that arise in the heat of an emergency”—in other words, to deal with the agencies that will inevitably let the president down in a crisis.
For an administration that has been so adamant about not playing the “blame game,” this looks an awful lot like an effort to make sure that the finger can be pointed at the bureaucracy when things go wrong.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Budget
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










