By Tom Shoop | Friday, May 18, 2007 | 05:06 PM
The Associated Press reports today that a nonprofit group is challenging the Smithsonian Institution's policy of claiming the right to prevent people from reproducing images under its control. The group is posting thousands of the images on public photo-sharing sites. I was struck by this part of the AP story:
Images made by federal government employees are exempt from copyright law and are considered to be in the public domain, said Robert Brauneis, a George Washington University intellectual property law professor. Most Smithsonian employees are considered federal workers because their salaries come from taxpayer funds.
So I ask again: How can the National Park Service claim it has exclusive rights to an image of Lewis and Clark that it created that was later used by a book publisher?
Comments
I am a graphic artist with the Veterans Administration, and before that with the Department of Defense. None of the work that I've created has ever been copyrighted or excluded from public use. It has always been the understanding of my superiors that my salary comes from public funds, so the work I create becomes part of the public domain. For example, we have shared POW poster art and other POW-related material I created with non-government POW organizations and veterans groups.
Geoff Liebrandt | Monday, May 21, 2007 | 09:08 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004








