By Tom Shoop | Friday, May 04, 2007 | 12:25 PM
In Al Kamen's column in the Washington Post today, Paul Light is back with more dire news about the over-layering of the federal bureaucracy. The latest issue? The proliferation of chiefs of staff at agencies. There weren't any until 1981, Light says, when Health and Human Services Secretary Richard Schweiker created one to help him cut through bureaucracy at the department. Then the position "quickly metastasized," Kamen writes, until now every Cabinet member has one. That doesn't strike me as being that big a deal, if such folks are actually effective at helping Cabinet secretaries work better -- and if they're people who would've been hired as "senior advisers" or somesuch anyway. But Light argues that the staff chiefs under the Bush administration are less bureaucracy busters than political animals, with "at least a dotted line to Karl Rove."
Comments
During my 42 years experiene in the Federal Government, we were overwhelmed with chiefs on top of chiefs. All it did was prove that too many ch(i)efs in the kitchen spoil the broth.
John Marchetti | Monday, May 07, 2007 | 04:11 PMChiefs needed only at right place to continue organizational mission no more no less.
ted knorr | Saturday, May 05, 2007 | 03:58 PMABOUT THIS BLOG
Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004








