By Tom Shoop | Friday, May 25, 2007 | 02:26 PM
Linda P. Campbell, a columnist and editorial writer for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, can't figure out why some federal employees would fleece taxpayers by illegally reselling the transit vouchers they receive from their agencies. "What were these 'public servants' thinking while they picked our collective pocket?" she writes. Then she adds this:
"I keep thinking about my father, who during 28 years as a federal employee wouldn't even read the newspaper or a magazine at work unless it was on his lunch break so he wouldn't deprive his employer of a full day's work."
Comments
The purpose of the subsidy is to clean up the air. We have already had Code Red days. I agree cheaters should be fired. Some employees don't sell them, they give them to relatives and then drive to work. This benefits no one since they still drive downtown and pollute the air. One comment stated, "And don't get me started on travel expenses". Try sitting in a bus and looking at single driver cars cut in and out of the car pool lane. People have no standards for their behavior anymore.
Lorrie | Tuesday, May 29, 2007 | 11:17 AMSet aside the fact that these employees violated the rules, and should know better. Transit vouchers (at least in my agency) are flat rates regardless of the actual transit expenses of the employee, and the purpose is to subsidize the employee's commute. If one sells the voucher, the employee still has transit expenses to pay for, and the gas it takes to get to the park-and-ride also costs money. Audits, investigations and the penalty process all cost taxpayer dollars, too, not to mention the cost of training replacements for terminated employees. Why not simply pay the subsidy and be done with it? If the employee continues to show up for work, the employee has fulfilled his/her obligation. If the employee drives (perhaps carpooling) instead of using mass transit, there may be issues that are better addressed by transit planners than auditors. Moreover, when the government charges fees for specific services and then throws the fees into the general fund, that is considered acceptable practice. We should get over the fear that somehow an employee might actually benefit from an employee benefit. (And, don't get me started on travel expenses.)
Ted Bean | Tuesday, May 29, 2007 | 10:11 AMWhen so many of our top executives and leaders get away with other sundry violations, with little or no price to pay, then the rest of the employees want to follow suit and get their cut. This is not justification for the illegal actions but a resultant mindset that unless you get caught, its okay. Need solid leadership to show the right path and the vast majority will follow.
Realist in Philadelphia | Tuesday, May 29, 2007 | 08:54 AMPut them away and throw away the keys.
charles gray | Monday, May 28, 2007 | 07:14 PMLet us not forget that most federal employees do beleive in an honest days work for an honest days wages. They would never violate the transit benefit privilege and are also horrified that any federal employee would. So let's all take a deep breath and remember that the violator's are only a handful as is true for any program, public or private. There are always a few rotten apples and they should be punished but let's not slam the entire federal workforce.
Skeptical | Monday, May 28, 2007 | 06:32 PMI am a active federal employee and utilize transit vouchers. In my opinion this is both the employees fault and the employers fault.
The employee is stealing and should be subject to civilian penalties for their thefts. For the employers, they should be instituting quarterly audits where the employee has to show their monthly (or whatever is received) tickets and unused vouchers. If not validated, the employee's use of the voucers would be terminated.
Charles Smith | Monday, May 28, 2007 | 11:00 AMThey belong in jail along with a fine. Personal responsability is not a part of many employees life today.
ken wiesman | Saturday, May 26, 2007 | 12:36 PMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










