By Tom Shoop | Tuesday, May 22, 2007 | 03:23 PM
Looking to buy a big house? Head to Utah. The Census Bureau reports that Utah leads the nation in large domiciles, with 39 percent of homes having four or more bedrooms. Runners-up in the huge home sweepstakes are Maryland, Colorado, Delaware, Minnesota, North Dakota and Virginia. In general, American homes are getting bigger -- at least as measured by the number of bedrooms -- Census researchers found.
Comments
Evangelina, I don't think your meaning was hidden. I'm just saying that your statement indicated that Mormons were responsible for all the large families. That simply isn't so, they don't have the market on large familes. However, I certainly agree with your point on what a waste of money the study is. What was gained from it? Absolutely nothing.
Heidi | Thursday, May 31, 2007 | 11:41 AMTo Heidi,
why is it that when people point out facts, others try to look in for hidden meanings. I happen to be Mormon, by birth and marriage. Utah has large constituency of Mormons, many of whom have a large families. That is a fact.
I do hate gov/our money spent on frivolous research.
Evangelina | Tuesday, May 29, 2007 | 11:15 AMThis is to Evangelina. Please leave your bigotry out of the discussion. Not all Mormon families are large and Utah is certainly not all Mormon as I know since I live there and am not a Mormon. Please leave the religious bigotry home.
Heidi | Wednesday, May 23, 2007 | 02:22 PMI wonder how much money was spent on this research.
Use logic, mormon=large family=many bedrooms
It would also be interesting to know the actual square footage. I have seen homes advertised with 4-5 bedrooms and the total square footage of the house is 1300 square feet. Pretty small. Rooms must be barely large enough to turn around.
Jo Ann | Wednesday, May 23, 2007 | 10:53 AMThe number of bedrooms does not necessarily mean a "large domicile". In many cases it is a smaller 2-3 bedroom home with a couple of bedrooms added to the basement in order to accommodate a large family. It would be interesting to also see the number of children/residents in the home and the yearly income factored in.
Keith (Utah) | Wednesday, May 23, 2007 | 10:27 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










