By Tom Shoop | Thursday, June 28, 2007 | 06:48 PM
What does the College Access Program, which allows District of Columbia high school graduates to attend colleges all over the country at in-state rates, have to do with the Office of Special Counsel? Rep. Tom Davis, ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has managed to make a connection between the two. This week, he proposed to support the college program by stripping $1 million from OSC's budget. That move just happens to come in the immediate aftermath of OSC's controversial investigation into the head of the General Services Administration.
Here's Davis' press release on his efforts (it's not on his Web site yet):
Davis: House Democrats Choose Politics Over D.C. Grads
Amendment Defeat 'A Clear Indication of Priorities'
Washington, D.C. - Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) expressed dismay today that, in a blatant show of partisan politics, House Democrats chose to support a widely criticized head of the Office of Special Counsel over giving enhanced support to high school graduates in the nation's capital.
"For years, Democrats have vilified Special Counsel Scott Bloch for mismanaging and politicizing his office, undermining employee rights and targeting whistleblowers within his agency," Davis said. "Now that he's turned his heavy-handed, retaliatory sights on Bush administration officials, they're rushing to his defense - even when it's at the expense of D.C. students trying to go on to college, at a time when Mayor Fenty is doing all he can to rescue the city's schools system. Today's vote is a clear indication of Democrats' priorities: politics over education."
The Davis amendment would have taken $1 million from OSC and redirected it entirely to D.C.'s much-touted, overwhelmingly successful College Access Program, which levels the playing field by allowing D.C. high school graduates to attend colleges around the nation at in-state rates.
Democrats have repeatedly questioned whether OSC was doing its job - until OSC set its sights on a high-ranking Bush administration appointee:
"Mr. Bloch ought to find a new job. He ought to be fired. President Bush should not tolerate this from someone he appointed," Rep. Elliot Engel told AP in 2004.
"Mr. Bloch's actions are part of a larger attack on the federal civil service by the Bush Administration. Over the past 3 ½ years, federal employees have lost collective bargaining and appeals rights, they have seen their jobs outsourced and now they face discrimination based on their sexual orientation," Rep. Henry Waxman wrote in 2004.
"Where were these Democrats and many others today, when OSC is still politicized and mismanaged and when D.C. grads are looking for additional support?" Davis asked.
Comments
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










