By Tom Shoop | Friday, August 24, 2007 | 02:09 PM
Here's a bit of serendipity for you: In her Retirement Planning column for GovernmentExecutive.com this week, Tammy Flanagan discusses the sometimes complicated effects divorce can have on the distribution of an employee's retirement benefits. And today, FedSmith's Ralph Smith outlines a case study in just how convoluted these cases can become.
Comments
She had a good attorney and he didn't, guess the adage "you get what you pay for"
dan ketter | Monday, August 27, 2007 | 01:18 PMThe previous post seems to have a point. Does anyone understand the logic behind this?
JR | Monday, August 27, 2007 | 11:29 AMMy Maryland ex is to benefit from any future annual increases typically effective in January, despite the fact I don't plan on retiring for another 5-7 years, and we have been divorced since 1998.
What's the logic behind that? I don't argue that she is entitled to increases FOR THE YEARS WE WERE MARRIED -- seems to be a fairly easy computation for a smart guy with a computer -- but to be enriched for the years when we weren't married and in the future??? Come on.
Mariner410 | Monday, August 27, 2007 | 08:41 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










