Header
Divorce and Retirement
By Tom Shoop | Friday, August 24, 2007  |  02:09 PM

Here's a bit of serendipity for you: In her Retirement Planning column for GovernmentExecutive.com this week, Tammy Flanagan discusses the sometimes complicated effects divorce can have on the distribution of an employee's retirement benefits. And today, FedSmith's Ralph Smith outlines a case study in just how convoluted these cases can become.



Comments


She had a good attorney and he didn't, guess the adage "you get what you pay for"

dan ketter  | Monday, August 27, 2007 |  01:18 PM



The previous post seems to have a point. Does anyone understand the logic behind this?

JR  | Monday, August 27, 2007 |  11:29 AM



My Maryland ex is to benefit from any future annual increases typically effective in January, despite the fact I don't plan on retiring for another 5-7 years, and we have been divorced since 1998.

What's the logic behind that? I don't argue that she is entitled to increases FOR THE YEARS WE WERE MARRIED -- seems to be a fairly easy computation for a smart guy with a computer -- but to be enriched for the years when we weren't married and in the future??? Come on.

Mariner410  | Monday, August 27, 2007 |  08:41 AM




Post a comment



ABOUT THIS BLOG


Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.

SEARCH THIS BLOG