By Tom Shoop | Friday, August 31, 2007 | 09:18 AM
The Forest Service is thinking about moving its Bridger-Teton National Forest Supervisor's Office out of Jackson, Wyo. The reason? Its employees can't afford to live in the town, the Jackson Hole Star-Tribune reports. With no homes available for under $500,000, "housing is currently priced out of the market for most federal employees," a Forest Service official wrote in a recent memo. The agency is looking at pulling up stakes and moving to a less expensive town nearby. That has local residents concerned, the paper reports, because "employees of the Bridger-Teton make up a healthy chunk of volunteers for the county. They are volunteer firefighters, Rotarians, Garden Club members, arts supporters, pathway advocates, volunteer ski patrollers and sports coaches and debate team judges."
Comments
This should be a wakeup call! Government service use to be a privileged job. Critical Sensitive potions are going to be harder to fill, and we are filling them with the lesser of the evils, because we do not have good candidates. If you do not provide a good quality life for G employees it will just be a revolving door. We are almost beyond the point of no repair.
Jeff | Wednesday, September 05, 2007 | 10:47 PMThis is one of the most ludicrous discussions I've read in some time. Towns like Jackson face a real problem; what do you do in a small community which has become so popular that the affordable housing evaporates? This is small town America - - that small comunity of neighbors where everyone looks out for each other. How do you keep that quality when plain old folks who work hard and play by the rules can't afford a roof? Have them commute from towns 40-50 miles distant (like Vail)? Suddenly Jackson Hole starts to look like any other city in America with long commutes, airpolution and strip malls.
So it's not a question of rich vs. poor. It's a question of community.
James Paris | Tuesday, September 04, 2007 | 04:18 AMDon't forget, you're talking about America here. It's the conservatives who set up the schemes that widens the divide between the rich and not so rich. (terribly easy to prove!) Let the liberals in and it doesn't have to progress like a 3rd world country...oh, and strengthen the labour unions, too...and, how about spending $100B here inside the USA, too! What a concept, huh?
kmp | Monday, September 03, 2007 | 11:39 AMNot fair, any of you. I live in Jackson. And like the majority of people here, I can only afford to live here because I bought my house some years ago, before the current run-up. We have an affordable housing issue, as do many cities. We are working on it. My immediate neighborhood has 50+ houses that are deed restricted to those who earn $60,000 with a single person, or more with a larger family. People who earn under $100,000 with families of 5-6 can get a house for under $200,000, when they come available. And more are being built each year.
That said, those who aren't lucky enough to get choosen for an affordable house often have to commute 30-40 minutes from nearby communities to work, shop, and get entertainment. Name me a large city where such commutes are not common. Elsewhere, commutes can be even longer. Yes, we would like everyone to live here who wants to. But like Manhattan, Washington DC, Boston, and San Francisco (and others surely), we have little land to sell. With limited supply and high demand, prices go up. Anyone know the price of a one or two bedroom apartment in NYC?
The rich who live here do pay taxes, and are required to contribute to affordable housing under many development schemes. So don't ding the residents. Most are not rich, and we are all struggling with this problem.
victoria | Saturday, September 01, 2007 | 11:18 PMLife style of the rich and famous isn't conducive to volunteer work on a regular basis as a permanent member of the local community. celeb-cause de jour with media present required. The elite moves in and drives out the not so rich and famous. I have a novel idea, make it chic to live in Rwanda; those folks are in need of a boost to the local housing market. For sale: mud hut, indoor plumbing not included. $500,000
joe | Friday, August 31, 2007 | 01:21 PMYou mean the rich liberals from California who moved to Jackson aren't taking care of these "volunteer" needs? I can't believe that.
David Schow | Friday, August 31, 2007 | 12:04 PMgreat let the locals pay the volunteers, or provide less expensive housing
dan ketter | Friday, August 31, 2007 | 11:45 AMOh, those unfortunate rich folks. They will now find out that they will have to do or pay for what they got for free. Wait, wait, oh never mind, I thought that I was starting to shed a tear for them, but it was just a twitch caused by the single, last nerve I have left from hearing about how the rich can't get everything for free while complaining about how overpaid government employees are.
Billy Bob | Friday, August 31, 2007 | 11:08 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Budget
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










