By Tom Shoop | Thursday, September 20, 2007 | 12:10 PM
"If I'm elected president, I'm going to cap non-defense discretionary spending at inflation minus one percent. That would save $300 billion in 10 years. And if Congress sends me a budget that exceeds that cap, I will veto that budget. And I know how to veto. I like vetoes. I've vetoed hundreds of spending appropriations as governor."
--GOP presidential candidate and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney in a campaign commercial unveiled earlier this year.
Comments
Unfortunately this years budget is running 8% above last year. we can't even keep it even with inflation
dan ketter | Friday, September 21, 2007 | 01:22 PMEasy to say, but non-defense discretionary spending includes all the services the government provides to the public. Better would be a cap on total spending at inflation minus one or two percent and include the defense budget (particularly the money we're throwing down the hole that is Iraq) in the mix.
Gov. Romney's statement is like adjusting the nozzle on a garden hose while the fire hose next to it still gushes full speed. We should manage the flow of money through the government as a whole, not in sound-bite sized pieces.
Just another campaign promise that will be forgotten just after the election results are known. Perhaps the people of the United States will someday wake up and see what a load of BS the politicians sling at us on a regular basis. Not before it really starts hitting home will we all begin holding these people aaccountable for their "promises". I don't like to sound negative, but after so many years of being fed a long line of horse crap, I suppose I'm just tired. This may be the first presidential election that I pass up.
orphandog | Friday, September 21, 2007 | 07:12 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Budget
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










