By Tom Shoop | Monday, October 29, 2007 | 09:27 AM
Here's the Partnership for Public Service in its latest report on college students' perspectives on government and the possibility of working for federal agencies:
"With so many students applying for government opportunities and so few entering government, it is possible that the problem lies on the government side. The [federal hiring] process appears to be turning students off."
Do ya think?
At first glance, this report seems to be more evidence, in case we needed it, that the problem isn't that young people aren't civic-minded or interested in federal service, but that they just aren't aware of the opportunities out there and aren't impressed by the government's hiring process.
And yes, I know I'm running the risk of beating a dead horse here.
Comments
When I see the PR about how successful the Federal Govt is becoming in recruiting recent college grads, I ask "what planet they inhabit?" I sat down with a recent Va Tech engineering grad and we plowed through USA Jobs. I kept saying to myself - now would be a great time to invent a real-time universal translater -as this young person had the glazed look we've all seen when trying to decypher the language. We are all done a disservice by a government that announces "mission accomplished" when the reality is anything but.
Agreed, the federal hiring process is and has been nothing more than a joke...and if you think it's any better once you are in, well forget that notion as well! The process is onerous, outdated, and filled with extreme bias as well as a non-merit promotion style that rivals any “good ol’ boy network” out there. I too entered through a special program and was able to reach a favorable pay scale quickly, but it ends there. Once you hit the ceiling of your pay scale you’re trapped, and with the “new and improved” pay banding scale, promotions come even harder than ever, regardless of merit or education. OPM has too many procedures and far too many exceptions provided to everyone but the most qualified for the position! Maybe the process would be lightened if the hiring authority was handed to the individual departments doing the hiring and kicking OPM and the indolent HR departments out of the process! It doesn’t take the private sector three to four months to hire someone…how inefficient is that!
Fed-up! | Wednesday, October 31, 2007 | 07:53 AMI feel for "Government Employee." I am in the same predicament, except that I am now close to retirement having spent too many years trying for upward mobility. I work in an HR department that trains and promotes the uneducated (high school diplomas only) into specialists and management, while retaining the college graduates as clerks and assistants to do the grunt work. Plus, I watched the excellent skills I brought from the private sector which landed me my federal position, deteriorate with lack of training and little updated technology. I wouldn't recommend government service to any young person.
Gypsy | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 | 03:27 PMNot only is the hiring process capricious, unreliable and difficult to manage, the internal personnel processes don't work. I have found it impossible to change job series (imperative for promotion), to apply for positions and particularly to get pre-government experience documented in my personnel file. The person who hired me cared little that I had no experience or training in the field for which he hired me (and misled me as to the particulars of the position for which he hired me and its potential for internal movement). I came in on a special hiring program which helped me realize my current pay grade quickly, but I brought with me a paid-for masters degree with many years of non-government experience. I continue to fail in my attempts to make myself attractive to supervisors in other fields (no experience in that field) as I continue to languish in a position I don't like and for which I have little affinity. I am venting, I know, and my situation may be unusual as I came to the government late but that should not factor negatively into personnel practices for me. I will probably leave the government as soon as I am financially able, knowing neither I nor the government has profited from my tenure, a loss for both of us. I think it likely that young people will also find what I found at some point in their government careers and move on before fulfilling their potential. They will leave (usually early on) the agency for which they worked with a position to fill, training the agency must pay to redo and hiring which will require cranking up the creaky, ineffective hiring machinery. Perhaps we need smaller government so the personnel departments can fine-tune their processes and we will need to hire, train and promote fewer people.
Government employee | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 | 08:31 AMApparently, the horse isn't dead enough as little is being done about the problem. Keep on beating it until someone in OPM starts paying attention.
Robert M. | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 | 07:15 AMI remember the first time I encountered a federal government job application when I was 18 and trying to get a paid summer job with SSA in Baltimore. The form was such a turnoff--I think it was 6 or 8 pages, and they wanted it submitted in triplicate or something, and I just thought I didn't want to work for an organization like that. Later, after finishing college with a teaching degree, I checked out teaching on Indian reservations with the Dept. of Interior. Again, the whole application process was just daunting and really made me think I didn't even want to finish the process, which I didn't. In the meantime I filled-in a 2-page application and was hired as a teacher after a short interview by a county in Maryland. I finally did become a federal bureaucrat after 10 years as a teacher--I completed a very daunting selection process for the State Dept., mainly because my zeal to live internationally overcame my distaste for the hiring process. The State Dept. has since simplified and speeded up its hiring process, recruits heavily at colleges, and is now rated one of the most desirable USG agencies for employment.
Dennis Imwold | Monday, October 29, 2007 | 03:58 PMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










