By Tom Shoop | Wednesday, October 17, 2007 | 12:35 PM
This just in from Network World's "Layer 8" blog: a new study shows that cursing in the workplace can be a positive thing.
Regular use of profanity to express and reinforce solidarity among staff, enabling them to express their feelings, such as frustration, and develop social relationships, according to researchers at the University of East Anglia (UES). Researchers said their aim was to challenge leadership styles and suggest ideas for best practice.“Employees use swearing on a continuous basis, but not necessarily in a negative, abusive manner. Swearing was as a social phenomenon to reflect solidarity and enhance group cohesiveness, or as a psychological phenomenon to release stress, ” the study stated. “Most of the cases were reported by employees at the lower levels of the organizational hierarchies and it was clear that executives use swearing language less frequently. "
(Hat tip: Slashdot)
Comments
I understand a person's 1st Amend. Right of Free Speech, but what of my right to not have to hear every four letter word that they decide to spout.
I agree with P.M. Correa, why use profanity, when there are so many other words that can better express what you are trying to say. Better to let the world think that you are ignorant than to open your mouth and prove it.
Peggy | Monday, March 10, 2008 | 06:58 PMWhere'd you get the idea you had a right to go through life unoffended?
aidan | Saturday, November 17, 2007 | 06:12 AMI would think the appropriateness might depend upon the circumstances (are you working with others in an emergency to rescue a lost child, to prevent an avalanche or some other life threatening situation, or are you dealing with a routine response to a GAO report?).
Since most scientific literature gets boiled down to a simple declarative sentence, I suspect that there are many caveats and limits to generality in the report of that study not covered in a blog entry.
I find myself thinking profanity, but other forms of explosive venting work just as well. And many alternatives are less likely to create a hostile work place. Teamwork and solidarity can be killed if the slang is used to exclude as well as vent.
A lot of people think that "a few choice words" or a high volume voice is an effective managing strategy. Usually, it's more of an intimidation with short term results, but that fails to develop and encourage employees. In the long run, the manager works harder to keep an eye on people or do their jobs for them because they were never encouraged and taught to be independent workers.
There's a lot more to debate than sloganizing and a lot more to managing than creating a short term sense of "camaraderie" for a select few.
Dave | Monday, October 22, 2007 | 09:05 AMI complete agree, i work in a kitchen of a very popular grill n bar and me and my fellow cooks use profanity very often, not in an abusive way but just to keep ourselves sane during rushes....it gives us a way to blow off steam without having to leave our work stations.
Kem | Friday, October 19, 2007 | 12:25 AMThere never is a place for profanity in the workplace, but neither is absence of passion for doing a good job. Also, fairness in this issue is paramount. You can't have "executive coaching" proposed for a profane NASA IG and then 3-day suspensions doled out for "disrespectful conduct" in the workng troops. There's a clear message here and it does not operate for the good of the public service!
Anonymous | Thursday, October 18, 2007 | 08:52 AMIf cursing and swearing bonds society together, then, parents and schools should unite and start teaching the positive sides of profanity to our children from the time they enter kindergarten. By the time they get into the workforce, they'll be experts at it! It's just too bad that there are no other words in the American dictionary or our beautiful English language to express ourselves other than by profanity for it to be meaningful.
P. M. Correa | Wednesday, October 17, 2007 | 11:12 PMI disagree with Dennis. Studies indicate that a varied and large vocabulary, no matter the words chosen to exhibit the vocabulary, is an indication of intelligence. In the simplest terms, it could be a large gray mammal taking residence on top of my house or it could be the @#&*! elephant sitting on my straw hut. Both express the situation; neither signifies a greater level of intelligence.
What I think Dennis means to indicate is the appearance of professionalism. (i.e. I know some very smart people who cuss all day long but have the social skills of a rabid badger)
Mark | Wednesday, October 17, 2007 | 04:10 PMI find that a few well placed curse words can add emphasis to my priorities and express my dissatisfaction with substandard performance much more succinctly and poetically than something like, "Golly gee, I sure wish you'd get this action out of your in box and into your out box and add some value to it in the process." And anyone who doesn't agree with me can kiss my a**.
Advocator | Wednesday, October 17, 2007 | 04:04 PMWhat an unfortunate article! When I was in the fourth grade, I remember my teacher saying, "You must not be very smart if you can't think of another word to use instead of cursing." Right at that moment, I determined that I would never give anyone an opportunity to think that I was not smart because of my language. It is a shame that military officers, civilian managers, and senior executives have to stoop to using foul language to "express their feelings" and "develop social relationships". I say we need leaders that we can look up to and follow, knowing that they are intelligent and worthy of their position.
Dennis | Wednesday, October 17, 2007 | 01:06 PMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










