Header
Planning a Freeze
By Tom Shoop | Friday, November 30, 2007  |  12:49 PM

Fred Thompson may understand that the real money in deficit reduction comes from entitlements reform, but apparently he's not going to be able to resist the temptation to package together some more conventional attack-the-bureaucracy proposals aimed at burnishing his small-government credentials.

In the Wall Street Journal's opinion section today, Kimberly A. Strassel writes, "According to a campaign source, in upcoming weeks Mr. Thompson will unveil plans to reduce federal spending by limiting nondefense growth to inflation, earmark reform, and a one-year freeze on the hiring of non-essential civilian workers and contractors."

Of course, that "non-essential" part, if it turns out to be true, is a rather gigantic loophole.



Comments


Didn't we try this trick in the early 80s?

Didn't it screw up the Government in fun ways now - with a nice big gap in the workforce?

John Penta  | Tuesday, December 04, 2007 |  12:40 PM



what a joke. May I suggest a freeze on essential workers.

rh  | Tuesday, December 04, 2007 |  11:28 AM



Is "President" a non-essential? jejeje

cruiser9806  | Monday, December 03, 2007 |  11:41 AM



good for him he has my vote!!!

dan ketter  | Monday, December 03, 2007 |  10:33 AM




Post a comment



ABOUT THIS BLOG


Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.

SEARCH THIS BLOG