By Tom Shoop | Friday, February 29, 2008 | 02:38 PM
The General Services Administration announced today that it's making some changes in one of its key line sof business: acquiring real estate on behalf of federal agencies.
Here's the agency's full announcement (it's not online yet, as far as I can tell):
WASHINGTON—The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), in order to better fulfill its mission of providing world-class workspace to federal workers at best value to the American taxpayer, has added a new Office of Real Estate Acquisition, the agency announced today.“As the government’s premier procurement agency, GSA must be vigilant in searching for ways to improve the way we acquire and manage federal assets,” said Administrator Lurita Doan. “This initiative will ensure that our real estate program is managed in the most effective and efficient manner possible.”
The Office of Real Estate Acquisition is responsible for the strategic direction for national real estate issues, including implementing the National Broker Contract, and the lease delegation program. Chip Morris, the former PBS senior legal counsel, was named Assistant Commissioner of the new office.
“This organizational shift is important because it more effectively responds to the fact that the amount of space we lease to house federal agencies has almost quadrupled over the last four decades,” said David Winstead, Commissioner of GSA’s Public Buildings Service. “Real estate is the backbone of GSA.”
Comments
Since Real Estate is the backbone of GSA, perhaps GSA's IG or the GAO should review the Public Buildings Fund and it's underlying statute.
As a financial manager for an tenant agency in a GSA owned building, and as a taxpayer, I find it hard to understand the logic for paying a "market based" rent for office space owned by the Government. Seems to me this eliminates most of the incentive for an agency to seek space in a Federal Building. If we have to pay a market based rent, why not go to a commercial facility rather than GSA owned? Since tenant agencies are paying market based rent to GSA, doesn't that completely eliminate any savings to the Government by GSA building and operating public buildings?
Oh -- I momentarily forgot that common sense and logic are not highly valued characteristice in the federal government...
DG | Monday, March 03, 2008 | 02:08 PMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










