By Tom Shoop | Tuesday, February 19, 2008 | 10:31 AM
I had hoped that this maybe was a joke, even though it appeared in the New York Times. Because it's very hard for me to believe, first, that there's actually going to be a sequel to the 2004 stoner flick Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle. But there is, and it -- I swear I'm not making this up -- is called Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay.
(Hat tip: BoingBoing)
Comments
It is satire, I read both "Tom Sawyer" and "Huck Finn". I got it, the slaves were talked about as if they were not human beings. Satire does bring humor and attention to serious issues. Satire is often more acceptable.
What's the big deal? In a society that values free speech like ours, nothing is sacred, nothing is above a comedic approach. Never mind real literature like "Huck Finn", although I see your point. This is entertainment using a current topic, pure and simple. This is more akin to "Raising Arizona" or "Oh Brother Where Art Thou?" which are also comedies involving a prison break, although these two movies are of a higher caliber than anything that the "Harold and Kumar" genre could do. Actually "Ernest goes to Prison" is about the level this movie is at. Certainly not anything to get your panties twisted in a know over.
Big Deal.... | Wednesday, February 20, 2008 | 07:40 AMIt is called satire. Ever read "Huckleberry Finn"? Slavery isn't funny. I am sure plenty of holier-than-thou types called Mark Twain was a callous monster without actually reading the book. How about "A Modest Proposel"? Ignoring the morons who took the idea of eating babies literally, plenty of people thought making humor out of Ireland's situation was awful.
Those are just two examples off the top of my head where humor was used to draw attention to something serious. I'm not saying this movie will have such an effect, but who knows? Anyone who read "Tom Sawyer" first likely went into "Huck Finn" with pretty low expectations.
Not too Swift, are you? | Tuesday, February 19, 2008 | 11:24 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










