By Tom Shoop | Friday, March 14, 2008 | 09:02 AM
The New York Times picked up on the IRS tax collection privatization story yesterday, with a headline that doesn't exactly mince words: "Taxpayer Advocate Says Outsourcing at I.R.S. Is Inept."
This, of course, isn't the first time that the taxpayer advocate, Nina Olson, has raised concerns about the IRS effort to use private debt collection firms. But this kind of mainstream media attention to the issue may put the program in jeopardy, especially if it becomes a factor in the confirmation hearings of Douglas H. Shulman, whose nomination to head the agency is pending in the Senate.
Update: Oops. As I should have known, Shulman already has had his confirmation hearing. In fact, the Senate approved his nomination early this morning.
Comments
Stop selling/renting our government to private companies! Tax returns are the MOST sensitive records that people have, next to medical ones. Hire more federal workers, train them properly, and expect competent work, don't give out SSN's, bank account info. to people who may quit tomorrow and take this stuff with them. It has been shown time and time again that privatization of government functions costs more, and is not better quality work. Stop this nonsense.
ChristmasTree | Monday, March 17, 2008 | 01:35 PMAnother example of another media outlet that reports the press release and not the record. Olsen's appeals for Congressional support and justification are worrisome enough - she has proven to be anything but apolitical - but when will the interests of the taxpayer superceed the interests of the bureaucracy? The New York Times - now there's a disinterested media outlet. Oh, somebody screwed up the publication schedule.
DC Fed | Monday, March 17, 2008 | 09:27 AMThanks for keeping the heat on this tax collection program. These private debt collectors are going after accounts that are uncollectible and/or are already repaying IRS. They disregard inquiries from the debtor about due process and disposable income standards for repayment calculation. The debtors end up using Taxpayer Advocate service to get back to their original IRS agreement. These contractors are taking their 25% from clients who are already paying IRS. How do I know? I'm one of the people who was making payments and suddenly found part of my pension seized without due process. The contractor kept sending letters asking for 45 more days to review my case. I first contacted them in September and still have no resolution. I never had that problem with the IRS field agents. They responded in a week.
anthony weishar | Monday, March 17, 2008 | 06:49 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










