By Tom Shoop | Friday, March 21, 2008 | 03:34 PM
The folks over at the Merit Systems Protection Board might want to take a little closer look at who's in charge up on Capitol Hill these days. The agency routinely sends its research reports to Congress and the White House, and the recent ones (here's one example) have come with cover letters addressed to the following people: the President, the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
That's all well and good, but then the letters begin:
"Dear Sirs:"
I'm not sure how much House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., likes being addressed as "sir."
Comments
If you use "Madam" or "Ma'am," what are you saying about the President and the President of the Senate (on the other hand, have they earned the right to be called "Sir")?
This is a fairly common problem with salutations. In formal correspondence, we don't want to be too personal (Dear Jim, Dear Joan), we don't want to be too impersonal (Dear Smith, Dear Jones), so we use some kind of title (Dear Mr. Smith, Dear Mrs. Jones, and let's skip the Dear Ms. question). For civilians, the title almost always connotes gender (a problem not encountered when the title is military), which leads to the embarassing question of what to use when you don't know the person and the first name is not gender specific (e.g., Jean, Carol, Lynn, Shirley). If you are addressing the letter to a mixed group, what gender do you use? Do you list everyone in the salutation to avoid this problem? Or do you use some gender neutral term, such as Dear Person or Dear People?
wallyp | Tuesday, March 25, 2008 | 08:52 AMWait...why use Sir at all?
Use Mr., Ms., and Messrs, as appropriate. The President, President of the Senate and Speaker of the House are common people, not lords/ladies/masters/honored-subjects.
Plus, this avoids the so-called problem of the word Madam (Madam is foremosr a simple formal title).
Perplexed at the nonsense of Sir in the first place | Monday, March 24, 2008 | 02:47 PMNit Pickers...
Richard Wright | Monday, March 24, 2008 | 02:14 PMSo then what is Ms. Pelosi - a "madame". That doesn't sound so good either....
JT | Monday, March 24, 2008 | 08:04 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










