Header
Sabotage, or Standard Office Procedure?
By Tom Shoop | Wednesday, June 11, 2008  |  12:19 PM

Here's the best thing I've read in a long time: Apparently at a conference this week in Boston, two CIA officials, in the course of a presentation on Intellipedia, made reference to a World War II-era manual on sabotage techniques published by the CIA's predecessor organization, the Office of Strategic Services.

The manual not only details techniques for stuff like setting fires and damaging industrial equipment, it suggests ways to sabotage ordinary operations of enemy offices by making it difficult or impossible to get things done. But some of the suggestions sound suspiciously like the way some modern federal offices run on a regular basis. Just check out these excerpts:

(a) Organizations and Conferences

(1) Insist on doing everything through "channels." Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.
(2) Make "speeches." Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your "points" by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate "patriotic" comments.
(3) When possible, refer all matters to committees, for "further study and consideration." Attempt to make the committees as large as possible — never less than five.
(4) Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.
(5) Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.
(6) Refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting and attempt to re-open the question of the advisability of that decision.
(7) Advocate "caution." Be "reasonable" and urge your fellow-conferees to be "reasonable"
and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.
(8) Be worried about the propriety of any decision — raise the question of whether such action as is contemplated lies within the jurisdiction of the group or whether it might conflict with the policy of some higher echelon.

(b) Managers and Supervisors

(1) Demand written orders.
(2) "Misunderstand" orders. Ask endless questions or engage in long correspondence about such orders. Quibble over them when you can. ...
(7) Insist on perfect work in relatively unimportant products; send back for refinishing those which have the least flaw. ...
(10) To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.
(11.) Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.
(12) Multiply paper work in plausible ways. Start duplicate files.
(13) Multiply the procedures and clearances involved in issuing instructions, pay checks, and so on. See that three people have to approve everything where one would do.
(14) Apply all regulations to the last letter.

(c) Office Workers

(1)Make mistakes in quantities of material when you are copying orders. Confuse similar names. Use wrong addresses.
(2) Prolong correspondence with government bureaus.
(3) Misfile essential documents.
(4) In making carbon copies, make one too few, so that an extra copying job will have to be done.
(5) Tell important callers the boss is busy or talking on another telephone.
(6) Hold up mail until the next collection.
(7) Spread disturbing rumors that sound like inside dope.

(d) Employees

(1) Work slowly. Think out ways to increase the number of movements necessary on your job ...
(4) Pretend that instructions are hard to understand, and ask to have them repeated more than once. ...
(6) Never pass on your skill and experience to a new or less skillful worker.
(7) Snarl up administration in every possible way. Fill out forms illegibly so that they will have to be done over; make mistakes or omit requested information in forms.
(8) If possible, join or help organize a group for presenting employee problems to the management. See that the procedures adopted are as inconvenient as possible for the management, involving the presence of a large number of employees at each presentation, entailing more than one meeting for each grievance, bringing up problems which are largely imaginary, and so on. ...

(Hat tip: JOHO the Blog, via BoingBoing)



Comments


W. Edwards Deming worked for the Census Bureau (1939 - 1945). Yes, I get the irony.

Lane Narrows  | Friday, June 13, 2008 |  12:30 PM



Did you get concurrence from your management before you wrote this article?

Karl Goller  | Thursday, June 12, 2008 |  03:14 PM



So that's why the front office frequently "misfiles" important documents. I should've known something was wrong when a colleague's "welcome to [x]" consisted of telling me to purchase liability insurance and make copies of everything because my files will be lost by somebody upfront.

Misanthrope  | Thursday, June 12, 2008 |  02:52 PM



If one looks at just todays Govt Exec headlines such as the one regarding the appropreations bill and the one about hiring ex offenders. The article above flat out says it all.

This country, and its Govt. are freaking out of control.

What was that Beatles song? I recall it had somthing to do with a revolution wellllllll......

Rooster  | Thursday, June 12, 2008 |  10:10 AM



Thank you. Everyone should read this.

Noble_Serf  | Thursday, June 12, 2008 |  09:58 AM



That sounds like:

A. The Congress of the U.S.
B. The United Nations
C. Montgomery County, Maryland
D. My Department, Agency, Office

E. All of the above

Answer: E. all of the above.

A faceless bureaucrat  | Thursday, June 12, 2008 |  09:06 AM



Did Deming work for the OSS?

WGK  | Thursday, June 12, 2008 |  06:46 AM



Wow. To think that my coworkers were trained by the OSS. Thanks Tom. I'm embarrassing some of my compadres right now.

WRS  | Wednesday, June 11, 2008 |  02:21 PM




Post a comment



ABOUT THIS BLOG


Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.

SEARCH THIS BLOG