By Tom Shoop | Friday, August 29, 2008 | 04:51 PM
The Wall Street Journal reports today that the Bush administration is considering issuing an executive order that would make it more difficult for labor unions to organize workers at federal contractors.
"The executive order would require large government contractors to use secret-ballot elections for union organizing or risk losing government contracts," the paper reported. Unions favor "card-check" systems, under which employees can form a union if a majority of a company's workers sign cards indicating they favor unionization.
Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama has expressed support for a federal law that would give unions the option of using card checks whenever they choose.
It's not a done deal that Bush will even sign the order, the Journal reported. Doing so would risk provoking the Democratic Congress to pass legislation to undo the action.
Comments
RE: wdjackson
Ireally think V.P. Palin would support secret ballots. What freedom loving person wouldn't?
George Bush and Uncle Dick have used Federal Contractors (outsourcing) and Contract Employees to try to brake the Unions that represent Civil Service Employees for nearly eight (8) years now (please escuse the Keeterisum, that means this is just opinion). If he should sign something like that it will just be undone by the Obama administration.
W D Jackson | Saturday, September 06, 2008 | 10:01 AMAnyone who supports unionization is too smart to vote.
Dumb Young Crow | Thursday, September 04, 2008 | 07:31 AMAnyone who is opposed to a union is too dumb to vote.
Wise Old Owl | Tuesday, September 02, 2008 | 10:46 AMOk, so the private sector unions and their union members (employees) want management, their supervisors and the public to know how they voted -- individually? Won't this will split families and old friends apart - particularly when the blame game starts and management reacts to the union vote and to the individual voters lists for promotions, job assignments and even what contracts (skill mixes) to bid for and develop? I hope the union managerial proletariate class knows what its doing.
DC Fed | Tuesday, September 02, 2008 | 10:36 AMBe careful what the media reports on this issue. The Unions, some members of congress and most of the media want to take away the secret ballot available now. I don't need anyone breathing down my back to see if I favor a union or not. You don't like management - go somewhere else. No one is forcing you to work for one company or another.
Adam F. Kohler | Tuesday, September 02, 2008 | 09:47 AMSomething that affects your paycheck or tax rate should be by secret ballot. Coercion or peer pressure is unacceptable to me. Might be great for union dues, but violates (what I thought was) our voting system. In my town, anything that hits the pocketbook is by sectret ballot. Vote pro-union or be ostracized (since your leanings will now be public,or at least Union, information>
Opel | Monday, September 01, 2008 | 09:24 PMThis E.O would probably be a good thing for organized labor. The Bush administration is pushing on a number of fronts to achieve by executive fiat what it could not accomplish legislatively in 8 years. The reaction of Congress will almost certainly be in the form of legislation that permanently overturns these E.O.s.
One better | Monday, September 01, 2008 | 12:03 PMIf the majority of workers sign a card.The majority of workers should be able to work union.The workers that did not sign a card could either work somewhere else or join the union its a win win.
T | Sunday, August 31, 2008 | 10:29 PMWorkers should be free to vote a union up or down without the union goons in the voting booth with them.
If its OK for the unions then all of our political elections should be conducted this way
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Benefits
- Budget
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Non-Profits
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace
- Transition










