By Tom Shoop | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 | 06:12 PM
I always assumed that every federal employee was at least aware of the Hatch Act, and its limitations on partisan political activities. Apparently not. The Saginaw News reported late last week that three Postal Service employees who serve as elected local government officials in Gratiot County, Mich., were shocked to discover that they were, in fact, serving illegally.
One of the officials, Tresha Graham-Mikek, a rural letter carrier, has been in office as Bethany Township clerk for 12 years. "I don't know what putting letters in mailboxes has to do with being a township clerk," she told the paper. "I've been a carrier for 23 years and the clerk for 12, and it's never been an issue. But the law is the law, and I understand that."
County Clerk Carol A. Vernon got an anonymous letter tipping her off to the situation, but she didn't know anything about the Hatch Act either. So she and county Prosecutor Keith Kushion did a little research, and lo and behold, they discovered that Uncle Sam, did in fact, frown on his employees holding partisan positions.
"Vernon suggested that federal, state or local government employees with partisan positions check with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel in Washington, D.C., to clarify their status," the Saginaw News reported. Yeah, that probably would be a good idea.
Comments
As a retired combined Federal / Postal employee of 38-years, I agree with those posters who posit that the Hatch Act needs serious amendment, especially as it relates to postal employees.
It never ceases to baffle me that the US Postal Service, while claiming to be a quasi-governmental corporation operating on a contemporary business model, self-sustaining and supporting, and not using significant tax dollars should be covered by the Hatch Act. Postal Service management forever plows both sides of the field as may be convenient stating on the one hand that it is a "federal agency" and then when another situation arises claims that it is uniquely distinct and separate and that its employees are 'not' considered federal employees. Clearly postal employees remain confused as to their status.
Moreover, postal management at all levels does an extremely poor job at keeping its employees well informed in respect to most codified federal statutes - the Hatch Act notwithstanding.
My dear JH & Informed,
-.
I appreciate what you’re saying, however, the Hatch Act was passed in 1939 and there has since been another act passed by Congress and signed by the President called the IG Act of 1978. The IG act has given enormous authority to a select set of employees whose sole function is to oversee the work of a department’s or agency’s employees – to include the head of the organization. JH: As a retired federal LEO myself, I appreciate your concern. It tells me that you were (are) a pretty darn good LEO. However, you’ve overlooked the IG’s role of oversight, not to mention all the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) that are in place to assist the assurance of fair and open competition for contracting in the federal government. There are far more safeguards in place now than were in effect during the days of Tammany Hall and FDR.
-.
It seems that you’re both viewing that all executive branch employees as corrupt individuals. I understand wanting to remove any possibility of corruption, however, federal employees are also those individuals who work for the legislative branch (Architect of the Capitol (includes Capitol Police), Library of Congress, et. al.) as well as the judiciary branch. Hatch applies only to the executive branch. Is it safe assumption to say that only those in the executive branch are corrupt?
-.
Federal employees are knowledgeable of the workings of government, and if they seek offices at the local level (partisan or not) not only are they interested in governing and bettering their communities, they can add a wealth of knowledge and experience to a more often than not barren landscape. Lawyers don’t necessarily make good legislators.
.-
Congress came to the realization that they were punishing retired military officers who were hired into the federal civil service by requiring forfeiture of a portion of their retention (retirement) pay. 10-12 years ago, Congress eliminated the punitive law and has found that many of the officers are bringing their knowledge and skills – many which have been gained at the government’s expense – to the federal government. So instead of paying contractors to provide these services, the services are provided by a duly sworn civil service workforce.
.-
Hatch’s time also has come. It is time to remove the barrier to local, partisan elections, allowing federal executive branch employees to participate in their communities as political leaders.
-.
Brian, I like your line of thinking.
Socrates was a man, Socrates was mortal.
All men are mortal. Therefore all men are Socrates.
The Hatch act does not prohibit federal employees from participating in local government, just in "partisan elections".
Federal and Postal employees can hold appointed or volunteer positions. They just can't be "elected" to those positions.
The Postal Service does advise their employees of these requirements. In this case either the employees didn't comprehend the regulations or their local managers failed to pass the information along.
PM18 | Friday, August 08, 2008 | 09:47 AMLeave it as it is. The law was put into effect for a very good reason and therefore needs to stay.
Informed | Thursday, August 07, 2008 | 10:41 PMDear JJ:
Though well intentioned, your idea is not a
good one. There is a reason for the Hatch
Act and if you look back at what led up to
the legislation you will see it's purpose.
Unless, of course, you favor the abuses
that elected officials and government
employees that were hired or appointed by
those elected officials.
DISCLOSURE:
I am a recently retired Federal Employee...with a law enforcement background.
Sounds like a management problem to me. Ever federal employee I know has had it drummed into their head about the Hatch Act. Of course that is DoD, so maybe were are more cognizant of these things. The Post Office really needs to get its' act together!
Suzanne | Thursday, August 07, 2008 | 08:04 AMThe Hatch Act needs to be amended to allow federal employees to serve in local government offices. Federal employees bring a breadth of experience and knowledge to the table, and would be beneficial to the conduct of business within local communities. Federal employees should be allowed to participate in partisan, local elections (nothing higher than mayor, or country supervisor).
Prohibitions against participation at the state or national level should remain intact. Failure to allow these employees to contribute to their communities is negligent and should be corrected immediately after the Congress passes the off-shore drilling authorization.
JJ | Thursday, August 07, 2008 | 08:01 AMproves that people in government don't know government.
brian | Thursday, August 07, 2008 | 06:59 AMABOUT THIS BLOG
Government Executive Editor Tom Shoop takes a look at news and events affecting the federal bureaucracy, from the perspective of a longtime observer of government.
SEARCH THIS BLOG
ARCHIVES
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
CATEGORIES
- Budget
- Comings and Goings
- Congress
- Defense
- Factoid of the Day
- Fedblog
- General News
- Government Operations
- Headline of the Day
- Homeland Security
- Intelligence
- Management
- Oversight
- Pay and Benefits
- Photo of the Day
- Political Appointees
- Press Release of the Day
- Procurement
- Quote of the Day
- The White House
- The Workforce
- The Workplace










