Fedblog


Rep. Danny Davis, who was one of the first people to throw his name into the ring for Obama's Senate seat, must be really pleased that for all the speculation about the identities of the candidates mentioned in the indictment of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich yesterday, his name has not come up.

COMMENTS


  • Dear Ms. Rosenberg: You're a reporter, and I'm resident of Chicagoland and a close follower of the political adventures in this upstate Land of Lincoln. The Blagojevich scandal is less than 72 hours old. So I suggest that it’s a tad too early to start awarding hero medals just yet – to Rep. Davis or any other Congressional worthies. You are reporting about a Chicagoland story aren't you; so, just the getting the facts straight, at this point in the saga, would seem a winning ambition, yes?

  • Hey, no hero medals from me, just observations. But law enforcement sources say Candidate 5 is Jesse Jackson Jr., not Davis.

  • Obama said he hadn't talked to the Governor, his man Axelrod said something quite the opposite...which one is lying? That's an easy one...one has lied all throughout the campaign about his associations. Oh boy, this is going to get good before it's over with.

  • Ms. Rosenberg: From someone well on the far side of youth, this blog site has always been very different from the blogs your generation has been using. As a representative of Government Executive, you need to develop, and quickly, the savvy and understanding that you are dealing with extremely professional readers and fellow bloggers on this site. So, don't use this site to propose your personal agenda and don't take comments personally. Where's Tom when we need him?

  • Helen, I didn't take "Concerned Retiree's" comments personally, but I do think it's important for me to engage with readers on this site, which is why I wrote back to him. I don't feel defensive about anything I wrote in this post: I actually think all the potential Senate candidates in Illinois whose names haven't emerged in this process must be relieved. Wouldn't you be, if there was a major investigation at your agency, you weren't to blame for whatever had happened, and you didn't get caught in the fallout?

    I'd be curious to know what, specifically, you miss about Tom's style. Are there specific topics you want me to be covering? I want to write things here that are interesting to our readers, but that also engage in a larger conversation. If you've got suggestions, please let me know in comments!

Post a Comment

By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

*
*
*
(you may use HTML tags for style)




*

ABOUT THIS BLOG


Government Executive Editor in Chief Tom Shoop, along with other editors and staff correspondents, take a fresh look at news affecting the management and operations of the federal bureaucracy.

SEARCH THIS BLOG


Archives


2011 |  2010 |  2009 |  2008 |  2007 |  2006 |  2005 |  2004