By Allan Holmes | Thursday, August 16, 2007 | 02:36 PM
Who is editing most of the entries on Wikipedia, the open online encyclopedia that anyone can edit? For government agencies, NASA wins by a large margin, according to the Web site WikiScanner.
WikiScanner was created by Virgil Griffith, a California Institute of Technology graduate student who is now the talk of the blogging community. Visitors to WikiScanner can search the millions of anonymous Wikipedia edits to find the IP addresses from where the edits originated. You can search by organization name or use a range of IP addresses. You can also search to find the specific edited portion of a Wikipedia entry, but that search function has been disabled for now because the site is experiencing large amounts of traffic.
News articles worldwide have searched the database to show how Wikipedia can be used to edit portions of Wikipedia entries for political purposes and to remove portions of entries that may criticize government programs or policies. Here's one from Toronto's Globe and Mail.
The government agencies that have been cited by WikiScanner for more than 1,000 edits to Wikipedia entries are listed below. The number represents the number of times a computer at that government organization was used to edit an entry on Wikipedia. (What exactly was edited cannot be determined until the WikiScanner edit search function is restored.) Many science-related government agencies make the list, although the departments of Veteran Affairs and Homeland Security and the U.S. House of Representatives rank 2, 3, and 5, respectively.
1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa.gov) 6,846
2. Department Of Veterans Affairs (va.gov) 4,210
3. Forestry And Fire Protection (ca.gov) 4,148
4. Dept Homeland Security (dhs.gov) 4,081
5. Information Systems U.S. House Of Representatives (house.gov) 3,736
6. National Institutes Of Health (nih.gov) 3,019
7. U.S. Courts (uscourts.gov) 2,869
8. U.S. Dept. Of Agriculture (usda.gov) 2,435
9. City Of New York (nyc.gov) 2,404
10. Salem Public Schools (ct.gov) 2,398
11. U.S. Dept Of Justice (usdoj.gov) 2,189
12. Information Services Division (nd.gov) 2,140
13. U.S. Senate Sergeant At Arms (senate.gov) 1,809
14. Federal Aviation Administration (faa.gov) 1,706
15. NOAA Aircraft Operations Center (noaa.gov) 1,590
16. Dotrspavolpe Center (dot.gov) 1,566
17. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (llnl.gov) 1,456
18. U.S. Department Of Labor/Employment Standards Admin (dol-esa.gov) 1,449
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (epa.gov) 1,449
20. Internal Revenue Service (irs.gov) 1,290
21. National Park Service (nps.gov) 1,214
22. Library Of Congress Information Technology Services (loc.gov) 1,142
23. Social Security Administration (ssa.gov) 1,134
24. U.S. Patent And Trademark Office (uspto.gov) 1,097
25. Virginia Information Technologies Agency (Vita) (virginia.gov) 1,047
WikiScanner provides "Wired's list of salacious edits" on a stand alone page. The list provides some of the more troublesome edits and from where they originated, including some from government agencies such as "FBI removes aerial images of Guantanamo," according to the salacious edits page.
Some of the edits are written with a pre-pubescent sense of humor, such as one coming from the Defense Network Information Center on the New Orleans Jazz Fest.
Then there are the more serious ones, such as the edit from the Federal Trade Commission on former FTC Chairman Michael Powell, who resigned in 2005. "According to someone at the FCC, they 'Tried to balance the article with a more neutral point-of-view.' You be the judge," according to the salacious page.
Comments
DOD does not show up because this is a list of only the dot-gov top level domain -- not dot-mil. It also does not include other top level domains used by state and local governments.
Paul Taylor | Friday, September 14, 2007 | 01:15 PMWow, we have some real experts helping to make sure the data on this growingly important reference is accurate and people complain about wasting time. These same folks probably also complain that the government is outdated and not using these technologies. ya can't win
Fred | Tuesday, August 28, 2007 | 08:36 PMThe operative question is, What kinds of information is being added to Wikipedia? I suspect the NASA folks are adding to the body of knowledge rather than spinning it to alter the meaning.
On the other hand, I've heard of a number of companies intentionally editing articles to substantially alter the meaning, to remove information unfavorable to them, and to add content unfavorable to their competitors.
Bright Side | Tuesday, August 28, 2007 | 06:15 PMNASA began as a Cold War propaganda tool ... most people would be QUITE surprised at the lengths they will go to in order to keep science in the news and appear to be in the public interest.
Cultural Captivity | Friday, August 24, 2007 | 06:21 AMMaybe this was one of the reasons why, when I was at CBS advising on the Apollo Moon Missions, I immediately discovered that space reporters had given their own explanation of the "NASA" acronym:
"Never A Straight Answer."
Richard C. Hoagland | Wednesday, August 22, 2007 | 03:37 AMThank you, I was amazed. In my brief perusal, the national agency visually most prevelent was the CIA.
Wonder what that means? Were they correcting erroneous information? I hope so. If anyone could keep us straight, I'm sure it would be them. *^)
Tip Off | Monday, August 20, 2007 | 11:36 AMThe biggest Federal agency, the Department of Defense, isn't on the list of the top 25!
Don Ruth | Friday, August 17, 2007 | 12:02 PMWikipedia reminds me of that old joke about the encyclopedias in the Soviet Union with the loose leaf pages.
Christiano | Thursday, August 16, 2007 | 06:55 PMPerhaps this activity falls under 'other duties as assigned' for Feds? It just warms my heart to know that so many overworked, underpaid public servants nevertheless find time to contribute to mankind in this way. It seems NASA doesn't really need a knowledge management program to capture all that expertise before it retires; just tell your junior engineers to Wiki it!
Cynicus Observator | Thursday, August 16, 2007 | 04:13 PMABOUT THIS BLOG
Allan Holmes on what's happening and what's being discussed in the world of federal information technology.








